By Jose Navarro, MBA | San Diego | The Navarro Report
Florida’s governor and Miami-Dade’s own homeowners are telling two different stories about property insurance right now, and the gap between them is measured in dollars, not opinion.
The state’s case
Gov. Ron DeSantis has built a consistent narrative around the property insurance overhaul his administration pushed through a December 2022 special session. Senate Bill 2-A eliminated “one-way” attorney fees that let lawyers collect large fees for winning even minor disputes with insurers, and banned the post-loss assignment-of-benefits practice that let contractors take over — and often inflate — a homeowner’s claim. A follow-up tort package in 2023, HB 837 and SB 7052, tightened bad-faith and claim-filing rules further. The state’s numbers are real: property insurance lawsuit filings fell roughly 23% from 2023 to 2024 and another 25% in the first half of 2025, according to industry data cited by insurance-market analysts. Citizens Property Insurance, the state-run insurer of last resort that ballooned to 1.4 million policies in 2023 as private insurers fled the state, has been “depopulated” down to roughly 336,000 to 395,000 policies by spring 2026 as more than a dozen newly approved private carriers — Slide, Orange Insurance Exchange, Mainsail, and others — absorbed the risk.
That depopulation set up this year’s headline announcement: Citizens policyholders statewide will see an average 8.7% rate cut at spring 2026 renewal, and DeSantis’s office specifically highlighted Miami-Dade as a top beneficiary — roughly 42,000 homes seeing an average 14.0% reduction, among the largest county-level cuts in the state, alongside comparable relief in Broward and Palm Beach.
The part of the story the press release leaves out
Two things complicate the victory lap. First, “reduced” is not the same as “affordable.” Even after the cuts, Florida’s statewide average homeowners premium sits around $3,815 to $4,120 by differing industry estimates — still roughly 24% above the national average and, by one tracking estimate, 51% above 2021 levels, before the crisis that prompted the reforms in the first place. A rate cut from a genuinely elevated baseline is real relief, but it is relief from a number that was itself historically abnormal.
Second, independent analysis disputes whether the reforms delivered what was promised on the claims side, which is the part homeowners actually experience after a storm. An analysis from ratings firm Weiss Ratings found nearly half of Florida property insurance claims were denied in the most recent year reviewed, and that lawsuit volume, while down from its 2022 peak, remains higher than it was in 2017 — before the crisis Tallahassee says it solved. Consumer advocacy groups have also pointed to executive compensation at newer carriers that grew rapidly through Citizens depopulation, including a reported $21 million pay package at one fast-growing insurer, as evidence that savings from reduced litigation costs have not uniformly reached policyholders. Academics who study the state’s insurance market, including risk-management researchers at Florida State University, have said publicly that the 2022 reform package was not designed to directly lower what homeowners pay — it was designed to stabilize insurer solvency, with rate relief as a hoped-for, not guaranteed, downstream effect.
Where Miami-Dade sits in the middle
Miami-Dade is not a passive bystander in this story. County commissioners have previously directed staff to prepare legal action against insurers over premium increases residents described as “unconscionable” — as high as 280% in prior years — and the county has separately studied whether it should offer property insurance directly to residents who cannot find coverage in the private market at all. That is not the posture of a county that considers the crisis resolved, even as it now touts a 14% average Citizens reduction for the homeowners still on that book.
The county’s own fiscal posture adds a layer worth naming. Miami-Dade just set flat, historically low millage rates for FY 2026-27 — the countywide operating rate held at 4.5740 mills, the lowest since 1982 — explicitly framed by Mayor Daniella Levine Cava’s administration as cost-of-living relief. For a homeowner, a flat or falling property tax bill delivered by the county sits alongside an insurance bill still set well above pre-2021 levels and administered by a state-regulated private market the county itself has publicly distrusted. Local tax relief and state-driven insurance relief are being marketed on similar terms — stabilization, historic lows, reform working as intended — but they are not the same balance sheet, and only one of them is a bill the county controls.
The verdict
On the metrics Tallahassee can measure directly — litigation counts, Citizens’ policy count, and the rate filings insurers submit to regulators — the 2022 reforms produced real, documented change, and Miami-Dade is getting a larger-than-average share of this year’s relief. On the metric residents actually feel — what lands in the mailbox at renewal, and whether a claim gets paid after the next hurricane — the record is genuinely contested, not settled, and Miami-Dade’s own county government has spent the past several years acting like it agrees.
Jose Navarro, MBA, is a financial controller and public affairs analyst based in San Diego with more than two decades of experience in public finance, government contract compliance, and nonprofit management. He publishes The Navarro Report, an independent outlet covering fiscal accountability and government spending.
Human-Directed AI Journalism